Women can’t seem to be able to debate. In the following video, a popular mbc show named “Kalam Nawa3em” (soft speech) debates the issue of women driving in Saudi Arabia. The debate is between Lawyer Firyal Kanq and Human Rights Activist Samar Badawy. The other three women are the show’s hostesses. They keep interrupting each other, and the TV hostesses are clearly pro driving. I feel a bit sorry for the woman in the burqaa, because she is against and clearly outnumbered. I’m definitely pro women driving, but I feel they could have managed the debate better. Ms. Badawy is probably the most logical in the group, staying calm and presenting solid arguments. I just wish the hostesses would stop getting excited and interrupting. But my sympathy for Ms.Kanq (in the burqaa) ends here. She’s got her face “covered” but a ton of eye make-up on. I think that accurately represents people who are anti women driving. Hypocrites. And she has no solid argument,(I’d never hire her as my lawyer) She kept waving the “red flag” of “our enlightened leadership”, probably thinking that she would scare everyone off by hinting that they are questioning the government & royal family’s wisdom. I was glad when one of the women eliminated that as a debate point by stating that they are taking religion and government out of the equation,”That religion and enlightened leadership are blameless here and it is merely a social matter”.

I hate groundless excuses like “because the streets are full already” and “lets look at other alternatives”. What cracks me up about “lawyer” Kanq’s point of view, is that our leadership hasn’t prepared us (the Saudi people) for women driving. Doesn’t not not having the foresight to prepare an entire nation for the freedom of transportation of half of its citizens contradict “enlightenment”? (She REALLY should look for another profession… logic is clearly not her strong suit, nor is presenting a strong defense). I personally think the Saudi people ARE prepared. You might have some idiots here and there, but I prefer to show good faith in my people (call me naive) and their ability to adapt to change. I remember only a few years ago you would laugh at the thought of a saudi wearing his seat belt or working behind a cashier. Now its the norm.

Another one of her points was that you wouldn’t be able to control your teenage children. seriously? So grown women shouldn’t be allowed to drive because their teenage daughters will be able to too? Maybe Mums can now get in cars and drag their teenage sons butts back home instead of waiting up all night for them. This woman is seriously weird. And If I were to pull the typical Racist Saudi Card I’d say “what kinda last name is Kanq anyways?! It sounds like she’s just got the nationality and is trying to prove her gratefulness and blind loyalty.” But I won’t cuz we’re all equal and it doesn’t matter where we all come from just that we respect each other’s rights. *Angel face*

I’ll let you watch the vid on YouTube and decide for yourselves.

OH MY GOD WHY DIDN’T I THINK OF THAT??!!!

I discovered a hashtag on twitter today #DriverDrama , where people (mainly Saudi women) are tweeting about their day-to-day driver issues!! HOW AWESOME IS THAT??!!!! It’s the same reason I started this blog, to share the funny, irritating and ridic!

As you can probably tell I’m very excited! most tweets are in Arabic, which made me realize I probably should be blogging in Arabic too… worry not I’m too lazy to perfect my Arabic typing skills beyond the odd tweet and official email i need to send every once in a while to actually do that, but I am aware that I SHOULD. After all, most of my fellow sufferers speak only arabic. Maybe one day I’ll translate this whole blog… haha no that is NOT my New Year’s resolution! Happy 2012 by the way!! May it bring only good news to us all. Hopefully one of them will be dropping the Male guardianship stuff and letting us drive! (Hey a girl can dream).

xox!

dubaidebates.com asked for 90 second submitions answering the Q of whether or not the current changes in the middle east will see the drafting of laws that give women better rights- and equal rights. This video is Manal’s submition. Sorry y’all its in arabic.

Manal on the law implementing women’s rights

YES!! She said what I’ve been saying for ages: Human rights and Women’s rights should NOT be separated! I hate the label “feminist”, its just another form of gender discrimination. Probably the worst since it carries negative connotations in the west. Why don’t they call male human rights activists “maleisits” ?? haha

Remember the case of the girl who was sentenced to get lashed for driving in September? She supposedly got a royal pardon (though the only confirmation of that was a tweet by princess Amirah Al Taweel, prince Al waleed bin Talal’s wife), but it seems that that wasn’t the case.

After exhausting “the quiet” ways of trying to resolve things, Shaima Jastaniah has decided to go public, hopefully International pressure will once again save a woman wronged.

I don’t know if it’s just me, or if this online “war” has been escalating.

The Atlantic posted an article recently about this poor girl’s plight. In a place where nothing makes sense, this is just one more.

I got into a bit of an argument with a friend of mine (ok well, not an argument, I simply lost it and went mental on him), because he was trying to explain to me how the system works in saudi, trying to get to the root of the problem in a systematic, logical way. In hindsight I feel a bit bad for getting angry at him, but what a explained later after I calmed down is that I KNOW where the root is. I don’t need to be systematic and objective I’m not her lawyer and I’m not publishing a research paper. I’m venting! I’m consciously choosing to be angry and give free rein to my feelings. I want to RANT! Which is exactly what I did. I wound up wiping away angry tears, to the bewildered silence of my dear friend.

THIS is what’s wrong: Its the organization of the judicial system. One that gives so much power to a Judge. Its the mentality of a Judge that decided to let his personal contempt for women who are fighting for their rights to show in his verdict. Its his clear message of “I’ll make you an example, I will humiliate you”. Lashings, in theory, shouldn’t hurt as mush as humiliate. And there are rules that state that the person delivering the lashes cannot raise his elbow beyond a certain point, etc… to make sure that the blows aren’t too harsh. Still, Its the concept. Applying what is normally only reserved for a criminal offense to a simple act of civil disobedience at worst. In reality its a woman exercising her human right. How could someone who is supposedly morally upstanding decide to punish someone for standing up for their rights? An insecure misogynist that doesn’t really fear God. That’s who.

I realize that my posts are becoming angrier and more bitter. Injustice tends to do that to a person. Still, I promise you I’ll try to find the funny bit in all this and try to laugh it off. My heartfelt prayers go out to Shaima, and her scary situation.

Till then, take care my lovelies.

Following up on my last post, here is a link to a “shortened” version of that so-called study, again I apologize no non-arabic speakers. But for those of you who can read Arabic, you will be able to see how, contrary to his claims of objectivity and “field research”, his “studies” are not only biased, merely a summary of some interviews with people complaining about the infestation of immoral crimes, but also contained what I can only call brown-nosing.

From the beginning of the report, you can see warning signs. He might advocate “respectful debate”, but it looks to me like that’s just an excuse to say as many outrageous things as possible, then demanding “respectful, calm debate” in return. F**** that. I’d rather go for the jugular. Lucky for me I have no claim to objectivity, which I learned recently was fine when doing social research, as long as the researcher admits to being biased and has no problem keeping that in mind. Our dear “Dr” Subhi’s problem seems to start here. He did not admit to being nonobjective, therefore losing credibility at once.

His second mistake is his seriously flawed logic. Let me give a clear example from the very beginning. He start by attempting to categorize the different opinions towards women driving in Saudi in groups, the first being the Pro.

القسم الأول: قسم مؤيد لقيادة المرأة للسيارة – مع استخدام وسائل الإعلام وإحداث ضوضاء حول الموضوع ورغبة في دفع الأمور بأي وسيلة ومهما كانت   النتائج – بناءا على أنها تقود السيارة في كل دول العالم فلماذا لا تقودها لدينا؟!

He states the Pro-driving group’s logic as following:(this is a rough translation)

The first category: The group that is pro women driving, using media and noise-making about the topic and wanting to drive the issue no matter what the outcome. Their logic is: Women drive everywhere around the world so why not here?!

Now, I’ll save my comment on his ill-interpreted and over-simplified reasoning for later. And focus on his quick & instant “reply” to this group, blatantly contradicting his claim to objectivity before he even stated his so called “research”.

The next paragraph:

وبطبيعة الحال، فإن هذا المعيار يمكن دحضه من باب أن العديد من بقية دول العالم تسمح بأمور كثيرة غير مسموح بها لدينا مثل الدعارة وبيع الخمور وزواج المثليين، فهل مطلوب من دولة تقول أنها تطبق الإسلام – مثل السعودية – أن تطبق كل ما تطبقه كل دول العالم؟

Naturally, this logic can be refuted by simply saying that many of the world’s countries allow many things that Saudi doesn’t allow like prostitution and selling alcohol and gay marriage. Does that mean that a country that applies Islamic law like Saudi Arabia should allow what all the countries in the world allow?!

 

Oh-kayy.Wow. I don’t know where to start, so I’ll organize this in bullet points.

1- How on earth can driving be compared to prostitution, gar marriage and alchohol consumption?! He is comparing three things that are high on the nono-list of not only Islam, but Christianity and Judaism too (excluding alcohol in some cases) with a perfectly legal, human right that Islam has not banned in any way shape or form. The right to freedom of movement is both a Human rights aspect and a religious one. The idea that a woman must be accompanied at all times for not only her protection from others but also from herself is a ludicrous new addition to “Islam” that is simply tribal thinking filtered through and disguising itself as religious. The only religious use of a “mahram” or male guardian, as far as I know, is when a woman travels in the desert for over three days. End of story. No need to get excited and generalize the three days to three hours. I’m sure if any conservatives read this they’d do the Islamic version of crossing themselves, by fervently muttering astaghfirullah! repeatedly as if I’ve uttered blasphemy. Sorry ’bout that, but I’d love to have you prove me wrong. Check your sources and let me know. Remember, Only sources from the Quraan or Hadith, with a solid trace for the latter deeming it “sahih” (true) and nothing less.

Back to original tpoic… where was I… oh yes!

2- So All the world’s countries allow alcohol, prostitution, and gay marriage? lovely. You might want to check your sources on that.

In retaliation to other points he mentioned in his “report”

3- Having some “researcher” tel you that there are studies in the UNESCO that find that the percentage of adultery, premarital sex, prostitution and whatever are higher in countries that allow women to drive DOES NOT constitute as research!!! You could have tried googling that info yourself, but I’m willing to bet that since Saudi is the only country IN THE WORLD that doesn’t allow women to drive, many countries will have higher rates of whatever, and many others will have lower rates, but they will all have women driving. Women driving isn’t exactly the variable here. If he said that a study shows that Saudi has the lowest rate in the world of prostitution, porn, sex crimes… etc, then he might be able to try to link that to the reason being we are the only country that doesn’t allow women to drive. But if he DID do that I’d probably yell BULLSH**!! If anything, our sexual harassment crimes are nowhere near low.

4- Why didn’t he compare numbers and statistics? In this whole “study” you don’t see a single statistic. He has vague references to a survey that he did. He does not say how many people were included in that survey, or what the results were in a percentage point of view. He only states the questions he asked them and then quotes the few that he found fitting with his own ideas. Objective? ha!

5- He mentions doing some of his research in “a country in north africa”. Why didn’t he just say Morocco? Perhaps because just saying that name is the Saudi equivalent of saying “red light district in Amsterdam” to a westerner. (No offense intended dear Moroccans, I can’t control how people think). And if its not Morocco, why keep it vaugue? Does the name of the country he conducted his research in affect his credibility? I just don’t understand his lack of clarity. If he were objective he could have said “I went to Morocco because such and such, to check one extreme for example, then I went to Qatar because such and such”. But this lack of clarity can only be called “Dodgy”.

6- One thing he mentioned that he observed from their media and newspapers is that women have the right to give birth in a hospital even if the baby was conceived out of wedlock. And that this is considered progressive…. Need I comment here even? I’m baffled. So he would prefer unwed mother to be criminalized and be forced to risk death and give birth in an alley with a butcher or a poor doctor that is risking his career to save a life instead of her getting proper medical treatment?! wow. He probably thinks that convicts in jail have no right to a doctor either, or is that okay for men only?

I think I’m going to stop here for now… I might update this in the future, but honestly, this is just a sampling of some of the most outrageous points he makes in his paper. I don’t have the time or patience to go through everything point-by-point because then I’d have to translate and analyze his whole essay which would give me high-blood pressure or something. I find that even his tone of writing is arrogant and nerve-grating. I can hear this obnoxious self-satisfied, self-righteous nasal voice playing in my head as I read the text. It actually gave me a headache. I have no idea if his voice is actually like that or not, but that’s how it carried on. Oh, and did I mention the load of brown-nosing generously peppered throughout the essay? *rolling eyes*

In closing, I’ll leave you with the embarrassing realization that this man’s wanna-be research has made a mockery of us in the whole world… on Saturday Night Live, no less!! (oh the shame)

On a lighter note, I can’t wait to see what 3al6ayer and LaYekthar youtube shows will have to say about this. I’ll let you you know if they post anything!

For those of you who can read arabic, check out the link. Let me know which point jumped out at you as most angering or illogical.

Peace out

I think the definition of “scientific research” in saudi should be re-evaluated. Ever since I came to the UK, I’ve been learning about research methodology, and I think I can safely say proper research, especially in non-scientific fields is generally overlooked back home.

Before you start accusing me of jumping to conclusions or being too harsh, please give this article a read so you can understand some of my overwhelming frustration. Its basically a “study” by some twisted example of the specimens we have to deal with back home, named Kamal Subhi, presenting a “study” that shows the Majlis al-Ifta’ al-A’ala, Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, with his biased results that if women were allowed to drive, there would be no more “virgins” in the kingdom! Amongst other things naturally, like more porn and more homosexuals too.

Somebody should tell this guy to take a look around when it comes to the number of homosexuals, since the men can drive already. Its not like women driving will affect gay men in any way. But thats besides the point.

I would like to see his scientific research. I would like to see how he came to these numbers, AND I would like to know how many virgins are there in the Kingdom at the moment. Plus why is it such a bad thing? Maybe everyone will get married and we wouldn’t have the “3anes” (spinster) problem they use as an excuse for “misyar” marriage ( if you don’t know what misyar marriage is, either google it or ask me in a comment). Which brings up another question: Does this mean that since married women are not virgins, then they can drive? is that the pre-requisite? haha, prove you are married or divorced or widowed and you can get a drivers license. Oh well, at least one good thing would come out of those situations. “Yay I’m divorced but at least I can drive now!”.

I would like to know how he rates the Kingdom’s social morality at the moment. And what kind of research has he based his far-flung conclusions on. Has he interviewed gynocologists? Sociologists? Psychiatrists? Women? Have those women said they can’t wait to be let loose behind the wheel so they can start their new moonlighting jobs? His lame example in the other arab country’s cafe… is his conclusion based on one experience? Maybe he was in a brothel. I could take him to a few cafes in Saudi where women signal availability and men signal interest all the time. Is he so naive or isolated that he thinks that limiting women’s human right to freedom of movement would actually prevent that? Has no one taught him that morals cannot be enforced, they must be taught. If its a simple case of lack of opportunity that’s holding back the muslim women of an entire country from becoming sluts and whores (excuse my language), then we are in a really bad situation. That doesn’t say much about the whole institution of marriage and family building, or religion and upbringing in general.

I just find this mind-bogglingly sad. That such a “study” was allowed to see the light of day. He should be fired. Then judged for Qathf, for as far as I’m concerned, he just called every woman in Saudi Arabia a potential prostitute if given the chance. This has become a matter of honor, and he should be punished for taking these women’s honor so disrespectfully. Am I being too harsh? perhaps. perhaps not. But the least that should be done is that he is stripped of any kind of professional or academic references he might have, though you never know, he might not have any to begin with.

here is the link to a BBC article on the same topic. Apparently it made the “top e-mailed” list. how embarrassing!

* Update: Just found an interesting youtube vid from a popular Saudi TV show that discusses hot local topics. My apologies to anyone who doesn’t speak arabic. It tries to give the issue an objective look, interviewing different intellectuals about this “event”.  One academic tries to give him the benefit of the doubt, doubting his research methods and stating that he probably didn’t realize how bad what he was saying sounds (reeeallyy?!). It does however, raise the issue of whether or not “Dr” Subhi has committed Qathf (false accusations against a woman’s honor) or not.

Yahala Show

** I was also happy to see one of my favorite tweeps, Najla Hariri, express the same opinion I had on holding him legally accountable for Qathf (false accusation concerning honor) of all Saudi women.

طيب القياده,مازالوا مختلفين عليها,لكن القذف العلن,الا يوجد حد شرعي له؟نطالب بتطبيق الحد الشرعي على كل من قذفنا في اعراضنا,وهم معروفون بالإسم
 ***For those of you on twitter, a hashtag was created for this topic. Some tweets are in arabic, others in english, but I’m finding most pretty funny! Sarcasm and mockery are always valid ways to deal with such ridiculous claims, in my opinion. #DrKamalStudy
Here is a great article I found on the Arab News website By SOMAYYA JABARTI.
I love how the frustration is really showing! I matched it up with this Image I found on one of my many surfing episodes.

Saw something like this when i was surfing the web. so I decided to re-create a better version!

Women drive in Saudi Arabia?

Outrageous! Incredible!

But why? Why in the world would we women want to drive in Saudi Arabia?

After all, we are so much better off tucked away in the passenger’s seat in the safe hands of Ali, Rico and Abu Taleb. So what if Ali milked cows back home or if Rico has a criminal record or if this is the first time Abu Taleb has laid hands on a vehicle!

Why, oh why, in the world would we women want to drive in Saudi Arabia when all the men and all the would-be-men (i.e., the boys) are at our singular service, idly flicking away the flies with nothing better to do than await the opportunity to drive us anywhere, anytime at the bat of our eye lashes?

They may have jobs. (Wow, they work?). They may have school to go to. (Educated, are they?) They may have errands to run. (You don’t say!) They may have lives to lead. (Oh like us you mean?) But they are prepared to drop them all once we whistle — sorry, call.

Because fathers, husbands, sons, brothers, uncles, nephews, grandfathers, grandsons, even grand-uncles and grand-nephews (how many more male relatives do I need mention?); or a friend’s driver, or a driver’s friend or the friend’s friend’s friend’s driver — in short, every man on every street in the Kingdom is at our beck and call. Right?

They breathe to drive and drive us only. Right?

These are supposedly the men-in-waiting who won’t ever keep us waiting, waiting and (more) waiting, come heatstroke, rain, showers or pain. You don’t even need to ask, ask and ask again; or persuade, cajole or even bribe. If you should ever so much as have to dash round the corner to the pharmacy, to the supermarket, to take your feverish child or your sister in labor to hospital — Shazam! Like Aladdin’s genie, your chariot awaits you!

How thankful we women should be. Has a woman ever been deserted at traffic lights or in the middle of the street by her driver? (On second thought, forget that one!) At least no woman ever had to drive a sick father, husband or brother to hospital. They are supermen, never given to bad moods or sudden, unreasonable changes of mind about driving us. (Oops, forget that one too!)

Our streets are a constant amusement park and we lucky, oh-so-lucky women should realize what a pleasure it is to be in the passengers’ seat! Why ask for more?

After all, there is the “mini-roller coaster ride” when any Tom, Dick or Harry (or more likely Mohammad, Mustafa or Mahmoud) drives the car in “bicycle” mode — one foot on the accelerator, then the brakes, then again the accelerator, then again the brakes and so on. Breaks, accelerator, brakes, accelerator. What could be more enjoyable than the forward jerk, back jerk, forward jerk, back jerk? Extreme neck therapy and digestive quickie all in one go! (Car manufacturers: Paper bags are the next big thing in Saudi Arabia after air bags.)

Next comes the Bipolar Flip-Turn ride. Dick or Harry suddenly wants to turn left but is in the far right lane, then decides again it is right he wants to turn to; sorry no, it’s left, no it’s straight on. (Surely it’s the medication he is or is not taking.)

Thirdly, the wannabe “Fast ‘n’ Furious” ride. Dick or Harry believes himself to be Vin Diesel. At 120 km/hr, he swerves to the left, then to mid-lane, then to the right, then zigzags back to the left, to mid-lane, then back to the right lane, back to mid-lane. (How many lanes are there?) Now right! Quick left! No right! Left! — I didn’t lose you there, did I?

Then the crown-of-all rides: My-Street mode when all streets revolve around Dick’s or Harry’s wheels and his wheels alone. He alone owns the street. The roads, the parking spaces are all his. No one else has any right to the road. They have to be psychic, able to predict his every move and intention. He signals right but intends to go left. He signals left but goes right. Or even better does not signal at all! He double parks, he triple parks, he parks on corners, he blocks the road. (Parking tickets? They’ll probably have to wait until 2015 when women get onto the Shoura and municipal councils).

My oh my, imagine what a dangerous place our so-safe streets would become if women were to drive!

But for the now, our uniform-clad menfolk merely need to watch over them. And they do just that. Watch.

They do not have to concern themselves with the suicidal or homicidal red-light jumpers. Long live the “Saher” system! Saher lights flash you once, flash you twice and flash you thrice!

And, of course, they catch every violation by every car we women own but cannot drive — cars bought with money earned, money saved, installments paid for by us. And because of it, though we are prevented from committing the traffic violations, we still have to pay for them, because they are our cars. Hail the balanced hand of man-driven justice!

In any event, our pockets are so immune to global recession that if a window mirror is cracked, crushed or goes missing; if the car should suffer a dent, a streak, a broken taillight or be involved in any accident (caused by Ali, Rico or Abu Taleb), we’ve ample riyals to spare! Fanning ourselves with peacock feathers in the back seats, we gleefully get to spill hundreds and thousands of riyals on car repairs, drivers’ visas, salaries, housing expenses, travel tickets — the list goes on.

We understand. Women driving in the Kingdom really cannot be considered. It would require:

• Training policemen to act, not just watch;

• Training policemen, males and men (there is a difference between the latter two) to treat women drivers in the same way they do male drivers, as opposed to chasing after them, hyperventilating or any other immature response. The alternative would be to employ policewomen (now there’s a thought to make many sleepless nights for men in Saudi Arabia!);

• Actually implementing traffic regulations;

• Accepting women’s total mobility (yes, your mother, wife, daughter, sister would go places independently — a scary thought!)

Too much change? Silly me thinking education enlightens you. Thing is, this here is no Wonderland. There are no Alices here. It is a land of promise.

We are all Manal, Najla, Shayma and Madeeha.*

This is a reality check, a wake-up call if you want.

Women in Saudi Arabia: to drive or not drive?

That is not the question. The question is: When?

* Manal, Najla, Shayma and Madeeha are Saudi women who have been prosecuted or cautioned for driving in the Kingdom.

Ok, so my country has gone mad. that’s the only way to explain it.

here’s is a short summary of what’s been going on:

1- As anyone following this blog before the summer knows, some Saudi women have decided to take matters into their own hands and drive their own cars, since there is no Law that expressly forbids them to drive.

2- some got stopped… others didn’t. Many police have been turning a blind eye to this whole thing since they are still in small numbers.

3- Last week, the King announced that women will take past in next year’s municipal elections. A big step in women’s rights in Saudi Arabia.

http://english.alarabiya.net/views/2011/09/27/168989.html

4- The next day, three women were arrested for driving, and a day after that one of them was sentenced to 10 lashes and a fine. (her trial was whirlwind quick, especially by saudi standards).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15079620

5-A few days after that, the king overturned this.Thank God!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-15102190

Hopefully this will be a clear message to anyone who decides to take the law in their own hands. What chaos!

 

 

 

Fayez Nureldine / AFP - Getty Images

That was the note attached to a broken side-mirror that belongs to one of the women who drove in Riyadh. I can’t help but be amused at the “Plz” on the note. Is that a request or an order? If it was a request, why break the glass? Furthermore, why is it in English? I can see something else written on the back and personally, I’m DYING to know what it says. I’m also wondering who took the notepaper from Fraiser Suites Bahrain. Doesn’t sound like a super-conservative to me. Maybe a kid out for kicks? anyhow, I think they should be found and made to pay for the broken glass and charged with vandalism. Do we even have a vandalism charge in Saudi?? hmm…

So now we have a broken mirror. A bit of a joke as far as threats are concerned but still, it could be cause to worry. Is this the beginning? Will little incidents like these increase then escalate? I think that any sign of violence against female drivers should be nipped in the bud quickly and decisively.

But the “Plz” still cracks me up!

This is the link to the msnbc photobucket page that posted the images and a short article.

Note on the msnbc article: The car in the picture does not belong to Eman al-Nafjan’s family, but to her friend Azza Al Shamasani who appears in the first photo.

So my mother sent a letter to a columnist in Arab News and it got published. So proud of her!
By TARIQ A. AL-MAEENA | ARAB NEWS

A growing social issue and a novel argument

With the buzz of women behind the wheels currently sweeping the Kingdom, many have defined and formed their opinions on the matter.

A novel argument, one undoubtedly thought out in detail and raised by one of my readers, deserves its reproduction in full.

Heidi K., a resident of Jeddah writes: “Perhaps we can try to get a discussion going in the Majlis Al-Shoura pertaining to this matter by using a different logic — perhaps the argument of conservation? The fastest and least expensive way to conserve water and other resources in Saudi Arabia would be as follows — allow women to drive!”

Heidi continues: “Where is the connection? Allow me to give an explanation in a very rough estimate of figures: If women were given the right to drive, approximately one million drivers could eventually be sent back to their home countries. Each one of these men consumes about 300 liters of water a day (about 1/3 cubic meter). That’s 300,000,000 liters per day for a million drivers. That’s 90,000,000,000 liters per year. (I’ve made allowances for vacation time). That’s 90,000,000 cubic meters per year of water consumed by drivers alone.

“The Desalination Plant in Shuaiba, Saudi Arabia produces 1,000,000 cubic meters of water per day. That’s 365,000,000 cubic meters a year. If we had a million less drivers we would only need 275,000,000 cubic meters. The Shuaiba desalination plant would thus have 25 percent more water for people to use if women could drive their own cars. Double check the math. “The same approximate figures would hold true for electricity consumption. Even if drivers were to be slowly phased out, this would amount to an enormous saving for the country in terms of water, energy, and of course finances as well.

The employment of drivers is becoming an increasing financial burden. Some women’s salaries are spent solely on a driver’s expenses. Should women then not receive government subsidies for each household, as compensation for the expenses of having to pay recruiting agencies, visas, air fare, medical check-ups, driver’s licenses, traffic tickets, extra living quarters, furniture, insurance, meals, medical bills and medication, and of course water and electricity, etc., in addition to drivers’ salaries?

“What a huge financial burden for a country which doesn’t have much of a middle class, nor pays a minimum wage much higher than that paid to a driver brought in from a developing country, many of whom have never driven a car before coming to work in Saudi Arabia. That brings up the safety issue as well: Safety on the road, safety allowing one’s children day in and day out in the presence of a stranger.

“Which leads me to my next point. The burden of women being banned from driving is also of a psychological and social nature. How has a conservative society such as Saudi Arabia ever allowed itself to bring total strangers into their homes, not knowing the slightest thing about their past, their moral conduct? It’s a mystery. The whole issue of the ban on women driving is a mystery and a paradox.”

And thus Heidi concludes her argument for letting women drive. In that she has chosen an original slant to a social issue of growing concern is indicative that this issue will not simply go away. Nor will those marginalized by social restrictions that confine and constrict their personal development be silent forever.  The blanket of traditions and beliefs should be shed from the body of this issue.

Voices have been stirred and have led toward actions, as we have witnessed in the publicized cases of those women behind the wheels. Those women were not trying to be revolutionaries. They were not attempting to revolt against society or create upheavals.  They were simply trying to address their frustrations, and in the only manner they felt was at their disposal.

Meanwhile we have Heidi to thank for yet another qualitative argument in favor of letting women drive.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers